NMRLS Home Page
Member Satisfaction Survey

Continuing Education Electronic Databases Consulting and Advisory Services Reference Search the NMRLS site


Summary of Responses to NMRLS 2004 Member Surveys

NMRLS posted three online surveys for member participation in April 2004.  In recent years the Member Satisfaction Survey drew about 100 responses.  This year response was slightly below normal.  The specific Database Survey was separated to encourage participation in the main Member Satisfaction survey by keeping it shorter.  The database survey drew only 24 responses.  The Directors Preference survey was new.  It was designed to assist in prioritization of library needs, should we find additional resources at our disposal.  Responses came only from academic and public libraries.  Responses were distributed as follows

Member Satisfaction
  - 87 responses -- 27 Academic, 25 Public, 32 School, 3 Special

Directors Preferences - 32 responses -- 4 Academic, 28 Public, 0 School, 0 Special
Database Survey - 24 responses -- 3 Academic, 7 Public, 8 School, 6 Unknown

 
Member Satisfaction Survey Results
(87 responses)

The list below shows NMRLS services ranked by the percentage of those who responded “excellent” (The percentage was calculated excluding those who do not use).  To view a PDF chart of results, please visit: http://www.nmrls.org/surveys/2004memsat/member-satisfaction.pdf
 

NMRLS Services and Percentage of “Excellent” Responses


Gale Group

82%

Reg. Ref. Center Lawrence Law

73%

ILL Center NOBLE

68%

NewsBank

66%

Reg. Ref Center MHL

66%

NMRLS Web Site

65%

WorldCat

65%

Online CE Calendar

64%

CE/Training Progs

63%

ILL Center MHL

62%

Suppl Deposit Collection

62%

Purchasing Coop

59%

eLibrary

58%

Online Newsletter

58%

Answers to Go

57%

Printed Newsletter

57%

Consulting Services

56%

Journal Art. Del. BPL

54%

Grolier Online

52%

Printed CE Calendar

52%

Summer Reading Prog.

46%

Reference USA

46%

MassCat

41%

Scanning Lab

38%

NE Mass. Digital Library

37%

Delivery

36%

Informe

34%




We received many comments about services.  We appreciated the many nice comments about NMRLS and service provided by NMRLS staff members.  For example, one member answered our question, What do you like best about NMRLS services with, “Efficient, friendly, professional, and user-oriented. It seems as if knowing that NMRLS is out there, a phone call away, I am not alone on the school library media specialist front waging the war alone.   We also had more philosophical responses like, “Equality and consistency of library services for all Massachusetts residents - school, public, private libraries all share and are given opportunities to work collaboratively.”  Many responses included comments and suggestions about NMRLS services.  We are reviewing them carefully and following up with some respondents. 

We asked members to tell us what was important to their libraries as NMRLS embarks on a strategic planning process.  Among the many responses to this question, many stated the importance of various services and the need to look toward the future in terms of technology, funding, and the need to address school library media center issues.

 There were 25 responses of “not satisfied.”  The highest number were found in Delivery (4) and Summer Reading Program (3).  NMRLS staff are contacting those who indicated dissatisfaction to learn if there are steps we can take to improve these services.  We also asked members, “What can we do to improve services?”  Several responses asked us to better publicize services.  Others made specific suggestions about reference and continuing education.  NMRLS staff, Executive Board, and committees will be reviewing all comments in the coming months.

 
Database Survey Results (24 responses)

The list below shows NMRLS databases ranked by the percentage of the members who responded “excellent” (The percentage was calculated excluding those who do not use).  To view a PDF chart of results, please visit: http://www.nmrls.org/surveys/2004memsat/databases.pdf

NMRLS Databases and Percentage of “Excellent” Responses

Health Reference Center Academic - Gale

84%

Expanded Academic ASAP - Gale

83%

Biography Resource Center - Gale

81%

Worcester Telegram & Gazette - NewsBank

80%

Contemporary Literary Criticism

78%

Junior Edition (K-12) - Gale

78%

General Business File ASAP - Gale

77%

Boston Globe - NewsBank

76%

General Reference Center Gold - Gale

71%

WorldCat - OCLC

71%

Business and Company Profiles - Gale

67%

Boston Herald - NewsBank

67%

ReferenceUSA Business Database

62%

Student Edition - Gale

60%

Kids Edition (K-12) - Gale

57%

eLibrary

55%

Professional Collection - Gale

54%

Informe (Spanish Language) - Gale

43%

Grolier Multimedia Encyclopedia

29%

Grolier New Book of Knowldege

25%



Responses to the Database Survey showed that all respondents who use the services, except one, rated these services as either excellent or satisfactory. There were comments that the Grolier services are slow.  We will be addressing this issue with the information provider.


Directors Preferences Survey
(32 responses)

The list below shows preferences for NMRLS resource allocation ranked by the percentage of those who responded “extremely important.”  To view a PDF chart of results, please visit:  http://www.nmrls.org/surveys/2004memsat/directors-preferences.pdf

Directors Preferences and Percentage of “Extremely Important” Responses 

Net Lender Reimbursement - Restore

67%

Continuing Education - Expand Sessions at NMRLS

52%

Databases Expand Titles

52%

On Site Services - Expand training and Consulting

50%

Delivery - Expand to More Libraries

40%

MassCat - Expand to More Libraries

33%

CE - More Well Known Speakers

17%

ILL Shipping Fees Reduction

17%

Digital Library - Post More Images

13%

Lawrence Law Library - Add More Hours

10%


Directors commented on services, some at length, with suggestions to enhance services, e.g., provide practical training and advertise courses carefully to allow members to accurately evaluate their need to attend.  NMRLS staff, Executive Board, and committees will be reviewing all comments in the coming months.

 


About NMRLSPrograms & Services | News
Contact us | Search this site | Home